Tech

High-profile techies are relieved Google triumphed over Oracle in a decadelong Supreme Court battle: 'Sanity has prevailed'

Alphabet & Google CEO Sundar Pichai
Google CEO Sundar Pichai. Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Read in app

The tech industry breathed a collective sigh of relief on Monday after the US Supreme Court ruled in favor of Google in a 10-year legal fight that could have upended the rules of software design. 

The landmark case, dubbed the "most important legal battle in technology," centered around Oracle's allegations that Google had stolen critical elements of its Java software to develop its Android mobile software.

Google said Oracle could not claim sole ownership of this type of code — known as an API, or application programming interface — which makes it possible for software programs to talk to each other.

On Monday, the court ruled 6-2 that Google's use of Java code, while developed by Oracle, "did not violate the copyright law" and was done under fair-use provisions. A win for Oracle would have set a strong legal precedent for whether it's possible to copyright certain code, which could have limited developers' ability to build and distribute software.

"Sanity has prevailed," James Gosling, Java's inventor, said on Twitter. "It's astonishing that this case even got started, much less that it ground on for more than a decade." 

On Twitter, Alex Stamos, a former security chief at Facebook and now a professor of computer science at Stanford, said: "Thank you to the Supreme Court for saving all modern computing from an onslaught of copyright trolls." 

Tim Sweeney, the CEO of the "Fortnite" maker Epic, also welcomed the ruling, writing on Twitter: "A great Supreme Court ruling in favor of software interoperability and developer freedom!"

David Heinemeier Hansson, the founder of Basecamp and a well-known critic of major tech firms like Google, said making APIs copyrightable "would have been a disaster."

More than two dozen parties, including tech companies and advocacy groups, voiced their support for Google's position in the legal battle, filing amicus briefs to the Supreme Court in the run-up to the decision.

In a statement, Red Hat, the North Carolina software company owned by IBM, which has long supported Google in the case, said the Supreme Court's decision represented a "win for developers and the software industry." 

It wrote: "It recognizes the critical role of software interfaces to promote innovation, interoperability, and new technologies. ... The issues in this case were complex and the Supreme Court is to be commended for wrestling with its decades long history."

Are you a current or former Googler with more to share? You can contact this reporter securely using the encrypted messaging app Signal (+447801985586) or email (mcoulter@jkmperu.com). Reach out using a nonwork device.

Read next

Martin Coulter was a technology reporter based in London.  He primarily covered Google, as well as Europe's buzziest tech startups, with a focus on artificial intelligence and cybersecurity.   Martin also reported on other parts of the technology industry including venture capital, disinformation, and regulation. He was also previously a technology reporter at the Financial Times.  DeepMind's cofounder was placed on leave after employees complained about bullying and humiliation for years. Then Google made him a VP. DeepMind's protein-folding breakthrough triggers fierce debate among skeptical scientists: 'Until they share their code, nobody in the field cares' An ex-Uber exec whose new freight startup is backed by Jeff Bezos and Eric Schmidt has been accused of fraud in a California lawsuit Inside Dominic Cummings' wild scheme to build a British Google via a no-deal Brexit: 'It's a bit of a simplistic way of thinking about technology'